Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

About the author

Eric Holmberg

Reporter | PublicSource 412.515.0064
city paper illustration
Illustration courtesy of Pittsburgh City Paper

What is Act 47?

Act 47 is a state oversight program for “financially distressed” cities in Pennsylvania. The state tries to help cities turn around their finances and operations. The name comes from the Municipalities Financial Recovery Act (Act 47 of 1987).

What’s the history of Act 47?

Pittsburgh has been “financially distressed” for 10 years. The plan that the mayor and city council are currently considering will guide the city from 2014 through 2018.

Who prepares the five-year plan on the state's behalf?

The two state supervisors are the Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority and the Act 47 coordinators. The coordinators are made up of financial advisors Public Financial Management and the law firm Eckert Seamans.

What authority does the plan have?

The Act 47 plan acts as a set of recommendations. But, if the city ignores the recommendations, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority can withhold all or part of the the city’s gaming revenue, as it did last year.

What happens next?

The Pittsburgh City Council will hold a public hearing about Act 47 at 10 a.m. on Monday, June 16, at the City-County Building.

What are the five things you should know about the current plan?

1) The Act 47 plan recommends that property taxes rise 5.5 percent next year.

In 2012, Allegheny County was ordered to conduct a reassessment of all real estate. Property values in Pittsburgh increased by 48 percent and the property tax rate, called the millage, was cut by 30 percent. Ideally, the increased property values should’ve cancelled out the rate cut to produce the same tax revenue for the city. It didn’t.

In 2013, the city collected almost $7 million less in property taxes than it did before the reassessment. It seems likely that the city also will fall roughly $3 million short of the $123.6 million in property taxes it expects to collect this year, according to Act 47 projections.

This chart is from the Act 47 plan:

Chart from the Municipalities Financial Recovery Act Amended Recovery Plan

To correct that nearly $7 million difference, the Act 47 team wants the city to raise property taxes by 5.5 percent. On WESA’s radio show Essential Pittsburgh, Peduto said Wednesday he thinks property-tax increases will be part of the final Act 47 plan.

An increase of 5.5 percent would make the city’s property tax rate for 2015 about $797 per $100,000 of assessed value, an increase of about $41 a year.

2) Pittsburgh’s roads and bridges won’t get better anytime soon.

As part of analyzing the city’s investments, the Act 47 team looked at our bridges and roads. If you’ve driven around Pittsburgh for more than a minute, their findings are not surprising.

The city rates the condition of a road using a scale called Overall Condition Index, which goes from 0 to 100.

Measured in square yards of asphalt, 56 percent of the city’s roads rated 0 out of 100, the lowest possible score, according to a Public Works report provided to the Act 47 team. Three-fourths of the city’s roads were rated “Very Poor,” the worst category, by scoring from 0-24 on the scale.

Asphalt paving has a useful life of 8 to 10 years, according to the Director of Public Works, which would mean, in an ideal world, the city should fix a tenth of its streets each year, or 86 linear miles.

As you can see in this next chart from the Act 47 document, the city only fixed more than 50 linear miles once in the past five years. And the backlog is growing:

Chart from the Municipalities Financial Recovery Act Amended Recovery Plan

The city has also fallen behind on maintaining Pittsburgh’s bridges. Of the 86 bridges owned by the city and evaluated by the Federal Highway Administration’s National Bridge Inspection Standards, 24 are “structurally deficient.” That is a higher percentage than the state average, which is the highest in the country, according to The American Society of Civil Engineers’ 2013 report. By comparison, only 11 percent of bridges nationwide are “structurally deficient.”

3) The city could save money by only using its bonds for long-term projects.

The Act 47 team critiqued the city’s practice of purchasing vehicles with money from its capital budget.

The city’s capital budget is funded in part by municipal bonds, which are long-term loans that ask investors for money in return for their money back plus a small interest rate.

Let’s say our sample municipal bond lasts 20 years.

If the city uses that money to repair a bridge, with a useful lifespan of 50 years, it pays for the bridge improvement over 20 years and then gets an additional 30 years of benefits at no cost.

If the city buys police vehicles, with a useful lifespan of two to 10 years, it continues to pay interest on the cars for 10 years with no benefit to the city if the police department no longer uses the cars.

By using capital funds, vehicles cost the city more than they should in the long run.

4) The city’s record keeping and technology needs to be overhauled.

In a variety of areas, the Act 47 team notes inefficiencies in the city’s basic operations, which waste employees’ time and taxpayers’ dollars:

  • The Act 47 team said that most cities have an inventory of all city assets and their condition. Pittsburgh, it found, may not.
  • The Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire reports its fire data to the federal National Fire Incident Reporting System database. Sometimes, the fire department can’t access the system and has to record the information on paper and wait to reconnect.
  • The Bureau of Building Inspection reported in February that the laptops they purchased for inspectors don’t work. “These computers were intended to improve inspectors’ speed and efficiency in receiving, responding to, and reporting code violations in the field by allowing personnel to immediately input service data and research property data in real-time.”
  • And thanks to insufficient technology and paperwork delays, “BBI staff cites a three-week delay to enter final permit information into the property database.”
  • The Bureau of Animal Care and Control manually records information about the 35,000 calls it receives each year. “The Bureau’s paper-intensive process for receiving, communicating, tracking and documenting service requests results in lost productivity...”

5) The city needs to put more money in savings — both in its own account, and for its retirees.

In 2012, the City issued $114.5 million in bonds, of which $80 million went to capital projects in 2012 and 2013. (The remainder of the $114.5 million was used to refinance old bonds.)

Even though that was the city’s plan, it was left with no bond money for capital projects this year. To compensate, the city transferred $25 million from its savings account, known as the reserve fund, to fund capital projects.

The Act 47 team uses the Government Finance Officers Association standard of having two months of reserves to fully fund the government, which is 16.7 percent of general-fund revenues.

Before the transfer, the city was doing well saving its money. It accumulated a reserve of $86 million, or 17.7 percent of revenue — above the ideal threshold.

After using $25 million from the reserve fund for capital projects and $3.6 million on severance packages, the reserve fund has $55 million, just above the minimum threshold of 10 percent set by the Act 47 team.

The city’s pension situation has improved, as you see in the chart below. However, it is still underfunded, when compared with the rest of the nation.

Chart from the Municipalities Financial Recovery Act Amended Recovery Plan

The current problem with the pension funds is the methodology that determines the city’s minimum payment.

The city calculates its yearly minimum payment on a 40-year schedule instead of 30 years. It’s like signing a 40-year mortgage instead of one that’s 30 years — you’d have smaller payments because you’re paying off the house over a longer period of time.

But, the Act 47 plan says, at that rate, the pension won’t be fully funded by 2037. The current system also assumes a rate of return on the unfunded portion of the pension is too high, according to the Act 47 report.

If the city adopts the minimum proposed by the plan, which puts them back on a 30-year schedule, the city would need to contribute an additional $11.5 million to the pension funds next year.

Reach Eric Holmberg at 412-315-0266 or at

Do you have questions or comments about the Act 47 plan? Post them here in the comments section or on Facebook and we’ll do our best to answer them.


To help facilitate the conversation, we've put together some guidelines so you'll know what we think is harmful or inappropriate. Harmful, inappropriate content will be removed and repeat offenders can be banned from contributing in the future. Click here to read our commenting guidelines.

  • Are there actual financial professionals involved in the design of these plans? Are there plans to reduce or restructure the pension plans being offered to reduce costs? Will residents have the ability to appeal the property tax evaluations if they are unfair? - by Lanna Yoder on June 16, 2014 - 9:26pm
  • Yes, the financial professionals who worked on this document are from Public Financial Management. They work for a lot of local governments and you can see their full list of clients by clicking on "general municipal" here: We link to the full plan here and the pension section begins on page 54 (type that into the top right corner): In short, yes the plan tries to help the city address pension costs. In 2010, the city took $45 million and put it toward the pensions. They have allocated more parking tax money to the pensions. But, on their current payment schedule, as we said in the article, they won't have it fully funded in 40 years. So the plan recommends the city should phase in increased payments to the pensions. On page 73, you can see they recommend no across the board raises in 2014 and a 1 percent increase next year. Yes, residents do have the ability to appeal their property tax evaluations with the county. There's more information on this Allegheny County website: Under "Annual Assessment Appeal Form," you can see all the places where you can get an appeal form. You can file a late appeal form on June 19 and August 14 (the next two dates): -Eric Holmberg - by PublicSource on June 17, 2014 - 3:59pm